The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is difficult to deem that the victim suffered approximately KRW 21 days of medical treatment, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant only displayed the wooden door that was removed to the victim once; and (b) the victim was able to live in breath.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances are revealed by the victim: (a) the victim stated that he/she was faced with the victim with the two or three parts of wooden joints, and that he/she was faced with the right arms; and (b) the defendant also stated at the time of the police investigation that "the victim was flicking the flick, and he/she was flicking with the victim because he/she was flicking with the flick, and he/she was flick with the flick board near his/her neighborhood because he/she became flick, and the victim visited the hospital on the day of the instant case, and was diagnosed with the right flicking part of the following parts, such as the facts charged, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by getting the victim's arms onto the wooden joints as stated in the instant facts charged.

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just and there is no error of law.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.