logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.08.22 2019고정181
폭행
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the Defendant’s selective ship engineer B, and the victim C (the victim over 47 years of age and South) is the B agency shop.

On September 21, 2018, around 21:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the victim’s breathing fat at “Esing” located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the victim fats in the middle, and said fated to be bad.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that at the time, the victim got in a singing room more than the table, while the victim took the body towards the defendant and the defendant, and the defendant tried to prevent him from drinking, and that the victim continued to have a flasing disease toward the defendant, and other improper behaviors were committed to assault the defendant by displaying the fire extinguishing machine, and the defendant was sent out of the singing room. The defendant merely received an unilateral assault from the victim, and the defendant did not commit an act of assaulting the victim by drinking blasing the blas of the victim, such as the facts charged.

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case, C's accusation and police statement, etc. are victims.

First of all, the police statements made by the victim in the above police by the victim are even able to be carried on the defendant by the defendant, going beyond the tables, and carried on the defendant, and booming and booming each other. This cannot be trusted in light of the following statements made by the victim at this court as a witness.

Furthermore, in light of the witness G’s legal statement and dispute surrounding and following circumstances, the Defendant appears to have been only passive acts to the extent that the Defendant was able to get off the victim’s clothes and get off the clothes in response thereto, in the situation where aggressive acts, such as holding the Defendant with drinking in excess of the table table and placing the Defendant’s clothes, etc., are continued. Accordingly, the Defendant was able to have been able to get off the clothes of the victim in response thereto.

arrow