1. The plaintiff's successor's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 11, 201, the Plaintiff Intervenor transferred KRW 127 million to a deposit account under the name of D upon the Defendant’s request on October 11, 201, and deposited KRW 50 million on December 14 of the same year into the account designated by the Defendant.

B. From April 11, 2012 to November 12, 2012, the Defendant deposited KRW 120,000 per month to the Plaintiff Intervenor, and deposited KRW 90,000,000 into the Plaintiff’s parent-child E’s deposit account on August 21, 2013, and paid KRW 17 million to the Plaintiff Intervenor.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff intervenor, the plaintiff intervenor, and the defendant 1-A.

항과 같이 피고에게 돈을 대여하고 그 중 7,000만 원을 반환받지 못하였으므로 그 반환을 구한다고 주장함에 대하여, 피고는 원고 참가인과 동거 중 원고 참가인이 피고에게 위 돈을 증여하여 웨딩�을 운영하였고 원고 참가인에게 입금한 월 120만 원은 생활비의 일부이며 원고 참가인 모(母)의 요청으로 일부를 반환하였을 뿐 위 돈을 차용한 것은 아니라고 다툰다.

B. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor remitted KRW 177 million to the Defendant, and the Defendant returned KRW 17 million to the Plaintiff Intervenor. However, the above acknowledged facts and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff or the Intervenor alone asserted that the Plaintiff Company F, which is the representative director, was transferred the instant loan claims from the Plaintiff Intervenor, and the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit, but the Defendant voluntarily consented to the withdrawal of the lawsuit, although the Plaintiff voluntarily withdrawn the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff withdrawn the claim transfer and takeover contract with the Plaintiff and participated in the Plaintiff’s succession, and even though the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant was donated, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor submitted additional evidence proving the loan.