logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.12.22 2017고단3178
폭행치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 24, 2017, at around 02:04, the Defendant driven a Crocketing taxi, and arrived at the entrance of the destination 25 Sung-ro, Seo-gu, Seosan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 100, sent the victim D (50 years) who is a customer.

However, the victim tried to board a taxi with no return home, and the defendant had the victim go beyond the floor by pushing the victim into several times, thereby causing the victim to suffer the injury of the victim, such as minculization of 12 weeks on the left-hand flusium and argument of garment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A investigation report (CCTV);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment.

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the following grounds for sentencing) have been 15 years for the Defendant to drive a large-scale taxi.

In the case of pressure to raise more than a certain amount of revenues every day on taxi drivers of companies, it is easy to call for passengers to find a destination beneficial to the point of time, and at night, it is difficult to call for passengers.

In the process, in order to implement passenger transport services, it is necessary to require considerable concentration and to provide a smooth service.

The defendant has a record of being sentenced to suspension of indictment at the end of the trial with passengers in the past.

Even on the day of the instant case, the victim was on board, was driving to the nearest destination by his request, but the apartment complex did not accurately express his house in the apartment complex, and the victim was frightened at a considerable end with the victim who was under the influence of refusing to get off from the taxi, and the victim was frightened to the scene to receive the taxi fee from the victim's seat while leaving the scene.

The victim was rescued by 119 after receiving the report, and it is reasonable to cut the body of the victim.

arrow