logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2018나6272
물품구입비용 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court's explanation is that the defendant's argument is insufficient to recognize as the defendant's argument as evidence that is additionally submitted in the trial of the court of first instance. The court's rejection of each description and image of evidence Nos. 8 and 9 is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition as set forth in paragraph 2 below. Thus, it is accepted by the main text

2. The addition;

A. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “each entry” is added to “the inquiry inquiry reply to the disciplinary failure corporation of the court of first instance”.

(b)as stated in Part 6, Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The evidence and the evidence set forth in Part 9-1 and 2 of the evidence set forth in Part A” shall be added to the following:

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow