The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is aware of the Defendant’s locked conduct, such as expectation of the body of the victim. However, the Defendant did not intentionally support the body of the victim.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances and facts established by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the instant facts charged can be fully acknowledged.

1) The victim, at the investigative agency and the court of the court below, did not act as if the defendant was locked and sold.

He stated that he would like to cut off his arms again, then sprinked his arms into both arms, and sponsed their face on the chest, and made a concrete and consistent statement about the damage situation at the time, and that the statement itself lacks rationality.

It is difficult to see it.

2) In the investigation agency and the court of the court below, the victim’s male-child appearance E also committed the same act as the victim’s statement. At that time, the Defendant was glicking, but glicking was glicking, and glicking was glicking and glicking.

When the defendant's face is checked even in order to resist the indecent act, the defendant was asked not to ask questions, etc. to grasp the situation, but to ask the victim's will. The contents of the statement about the defendant's attitude, etc. at the time are specific, objective and reasonable, and the statement of the victim also coincide with the statement of the victim.

3) Meanwhile, the court below found the victim and witness E guilty of the charged facts of this case by admitting the credibility of the victim's and witness E's testimony and putting them guilty of the charged facts of this case. The court below erred in determining the credibility of the above testimony of the victim and witness E.

It is difficult to see it.

4) The subjective motive or purpose is to stimulate the defendant to feel sexual desire.