logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019.10.10 2017나23401
하자보수보증금등
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim extended and modified in this Court, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The Plaintiff is Daegu-gu A Apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

In order to manage the apartment building of this case, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a construction company that constructed and sold the apartment building of this case, and the name was changed from “Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation” to “Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation”; hereinafter “Defendant B’s Guarantee Corporation”) is a person who guarantees the duty to repair the defects of Defendant B’s Plaintiff as seen below.

3) Defendant B’s supplementary intervenor C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”)

(2) As a contractor for landscaping and construction, the part concerning the “ landscaping and installation of facilities” among the new apartment construction works in this case that was subcontracted by Defendant B is the subcontractor. (2) From October 29, 2009 to October 28, 2010 to October 29, 201, KRW 21,074,410 to October 29, 2009 to October 29 to October 28, 201, KRW 521,074,410 to KRW 30,000 to KRW 36.5,00 from October 29 to October 28, 201, KRW 205 to KRW 38,611, KRW 6164 to April 28, 201 to KRW 208, KRW 95, KRW 209 to KRW 93,508, KRW 209 to August 29, 2008, KRW 209 to August 5, 209, 209.

(C) Since then, the secured creditor was changed to the Plaintiff. (1) Defendant B was subject to the inspection of use of the instant apartment on October 29, 2009, and Defendant B did not perform the construction work in accordance with the design drawings in the process of constructing the instant apartment, or changed differently from the defective construction or design drawings.

arrow