Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:50 on July 15, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as driving away from the B, which was frighted in the front of the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, on the ground that the Defendant was frighted with B, which was frighted in the front of the city, when the Defendant was brighted with B, who was frightened, and frighted by the victim G, who was fright back in his/her hands, and boomed the body of the victim.

2. On July 16, 2016, at around 00:05, the Defendant received 112 declarations (No. 25), stating that “the wounded shall assault the wounded.” (No. 25), and committed assault by the police officer, i.e., f., f., f., hinginging the Defendant’s bath to the said G, hinginging the Defendant again, and hinging the Defendant again, hinging the F’s hinging, hinginginging the F’s face at his hand, hinging the hinginger’s face, hinging the hinginger’s face one time, and continuing to restrain the hinger E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in the suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that, with respect to the facts charged that the Defendant assaulted B at a temporary place under Paragraph (1) of the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below, “B” refers to the following facts: (a) the 11th internal investigation report of the records (as of July 16, 2016) stated that B had satisfly heard the Defendant’s lower-proof and satisfly claimed that he did not want to receive the case of assault damage; and (b) that B returned home to the Defendant