logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.06.16 2019가단6851
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) the delivery of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ground Dho Lake buildings;

(b) KRW 8,000,000 and this shall apply;

Reasons

1. On October 12, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a lease contract with the Defendant and Seongdong-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant building”) on October 12, 2015, with a lease deposit of KRW 300,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 300,000, taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the grounds of the claim Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3. However, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff a rent from October 2017, and the Plaintiff terminated the lease contract.

In the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the return of unjust enrichment calculated at the rate of KRW 5,628,910 per month of the monthly management expenses from November 12, 2019 to November 11, 2019, and damages for delay from November 12, 2019, ③ return of unjust enrichment calculated at the rate of KRW 300,000 per month corresponding to the monthly rent from November 12, 2019 to the delivery date of the instant building; ④ claim for the payment of KRW 5,628,910, which the Defendant had not been paid until November 11, 2019, ⑤ Claim for the return of unjust enrichment calculated at the rate of KRW 150,00 per month of the monthly management expenses from November 12, 2019 to the delivery date of the instant building; and the Defendant did not dispute the Plaintiff’s submission of a reply to the Plaintiff on June 20, 2019.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow