1. Attached Form 1. The designated parties to the list (including the appointed parties) shall enter the same description in the column of the property leased until January 5, 2016.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in accordance with Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul evidence 1, 2, and 5, taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings:

Around 195, the Defendant newly built the E Parking Lot (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) on the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Seocho-gu D) land and donated it to Seoul Metropolitan Government. On February 26, 1996, the Seoul Metropolitan Government permitted the Defendant to use the instant building for 20 years from January 6, 1996 to January 5, 2016.

(The letter of permission for free use is written until January 5, 2015, but it is mistakenly written and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City confirmed that the period of permission for free use was no later than January 5, 2016 to the defendant on July 21, 2014; hereinafter referred to as the “instant permission for free use”). (B)

The plaintiffs (appointed parties, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs) A and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs without distinguishing them) are those who enter into a lease or sales contract, or have transferred the status of the parties to the above contract from those who entered into the above contract in the number of units, such as attached Tables 1 and 2, on each column of the object of lease of attached Forms 1 and 2, among the building in the case between the defendant and the defendant.

C. From 195 to 1998, most of the Plaintiffs listed in attached Table 1. The Plaintiffs agreed to enter into a sales contract for the E parking lot stores from 1995 to 1998 (However, Plaintiff F entered into the lease contract for each of Plaintiff G on February 28, 2000, and Plaintiff G on August 11, 1999) and agreed to the lease period for twenty (20) years from the date of permission for use (for Plaintiff F, G, H, and I, it stated that it would be next to the phrase “20 years from the date of permission for use” only in the case of Plaintiff F, H, H, and I) and attached Form 2, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract for the E parking lot business after 200, and agreed to the period of sales from the date of permission for use to January 5, 2015.

The defendant.