Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 1 million won of fine, and 2 million won of fine at the Jeju District Court on May 10, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 10, 2016.

The Defendant, from October 14, 2015 to October 18:54 of the same day, entered the restaurant of “E” operated by Seopopo City C and the victim D, to enter the restaurant of “E”, and, under the influence of alcohol, she takes a large amount of desire for an employee who sees on the part of the Defendant at the place, and continuously enters the kitchen and bring an accusation against the police.

"Along with the business of the victim, it interfered with the business of the restaurant."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. 112 Declarations;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: The detailed statements of the case and the application of each of the statutes governing the judgment;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant, on April 13, 2015, was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million due to interference with business by the Jeju District Court on April 13, 2015, and at the same time, the Defendant went to the instant crime, and that the victim wants to punish the Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the facts that the defendant led to the crime of this case, his mistake is divided, the equity should be taken into account when the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the crime of coercion for which judgment has become final and conclusive, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, means and result, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following factors.