logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단2543
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2014, at around 20:23, the Defendant was on the front of “C Ski” in the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City, and was sent to the police station of Ulsan Central Police Station, which was sent to the police station of Ulsan Central Police Station upon receiving a report, and was on the front of the “C Ski”. The Defendant was on the front of the “C Ski”, and was on the front of the Defendant’s house aboard the patrol box by E, and by

At around 20:40 on the same day, when the defendant moved ahead of the "Nown basin" located in the Dong, the defendant did not inform the above police officers who should receive other reports about the location of the defendant's house at hand, and did so in front of the mountain basin by drinking, taking a bath by drinking, and putting the defendant's house in front of the mountain basin. On the ground that the fire occurred, the defendant expressed that "N's name is welve, this blick," and expressed that "I will be blick, this blick," and that "I will be blick," and blick E blicked, "I will be blick, blick," and blick the defendant's house with hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning patrol duty 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is under the influence of alcohol, it is not good to obstruct a police officer’s official duties, such as taking a bath and assault. However, considering the fact that there are no criminal records of the same kind of crime and no criminal records other than the punishment imposed once by the fine, and that his mistake is in profoundly against the order, the punishment shall be determined as per Disposition.

arrow