logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.07 2013고정2686
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2013, from around 20:00 to 20:26 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s restaurant business by force of approximately 20 minutes, including, but not limited to, the victim’s abusives, referring to the “E restaurant” operated by the victim D (or the age of 52) located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, to return 200,000 won to the victim. In addition, the Defendant: (a) took a bath at the entrance of the restaurant; (b) made it possible for customers to enter the restaurant; and (c) made it possible for customers to feel food at the restaurant by creating a sense of fear; and (d) interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. At around 20:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by a police officer, such as: (a) when she satisfies as described in paragraph (1) on the same day; (b) when she satisfies a police box G and a police box H, who was called upon 112 reported and used to stop the Defendant and return home; but (c) when she satfes the face of the said G, he satfes the Defendant “this satfes” and satisfs the face of the said G at once.

3. The Defendant damaged property by assaulting the victim G face as described in paragraph (2) and destroying the property equivalent to KRW 100,000 for estimate, while the spawn spawn worn by the victim G was falling under the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Written estimate for warning; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to voice files, such as field photographs, police officers, and owners;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: Selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow