Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:20 on October 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) within the C Ski-gu Ski-gu Ski-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (c) caused the victim’s wife to change the level of credit; and (d) caused the victim’s wife to destroy a brush, which was in the display stand, by breaking the c5,000 won by breaking the fluor in hand; and (c) caused the destruction of the fluor’s fluor’s fluor to damage the floor by cutting down the fluor’s fluor’s fluor, which is worth KRW 5,00, and caused damage to its utility by destroying the property.

2. At the date and time set forth in the above Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that the Defendant was able to cause any harm or injury to the victim by shouldering the ererer’s disease, which is a dangerous object in front of the place; (b) throwing away the ergas in the victim D; and (c) leaving the victim satisfy; and (d)

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 366, 284, and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On October 205, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim, including the victim, who spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, and spawn, spawn, and spawn, on the ground that the wife of the victim D changed the level of credit.

2. In light of the judgment, the crime of assault under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act is a case in which a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the written agreement submitted to this court on November 25, 2013, D may recognize the fact that it expresses its intent not to punish the defendant.