logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고정1875
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at a mobile phone agency with no knowledge of the trade name in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant paid to the victim B with all charges on the face of the cell phone opening through the cell phone opening in the office.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay mobile phone use fees, such as registration as a bad credit holder at the time.

As such, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and using the cell phone gallony (C) which was opened in the name of the victim, did not pay KRW 1,899,592 of the mobile phone use fee and KRW 800,000 of the mobile phone machine price; and (b) obtained property benefits equivalent to KRW 1,89,592 of the mobile phone use fee.

2. On September 2013, where the Defendant was unable to know a place where it was around 2013, the Defendant: “If the Defendant borrowed KRW 3 million from the victim’s name due to the defect, office rent, such as a rental car business, and the shortage of office rent, and borrowed KRW 2 million, the Defendant will pay all the interest and principal on the loan of KRW 3 million.0 million.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to proceed with the rental car business or to repay the borrowed money.

On September 5, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim borrow KRW 3 million from D around September 5, 2013, and received KRW 2 million from the national bank account under E to the national bank account under E on the same day and acquired it by defrauded.

3. On September 2013, where the Defendant was unable to know a location in light of the following, the Defendant: “The Defendant leased an officetel because it was well known that the Defendant was an officetel’s business, and thereby there was a defect in the Internet TV broadcast “Africa” broadcast; however, there was no cost to rent an officetel. If the Defendant borrowed 2.5 million won as security four vehicles, and lends 2 million won only to the Defendant.

arrow