beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to KRW 46,402,136 and KRW 46,078,340 among them, Defendant A shall have from July 10, 2012 to November 30, 2012.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around September 2010, Defendant F consulted Defendant A, who is difficult to borrow a financial institution by normal means, or Defendant A, who was aware that Defendant A was not entitled to a loan due to a sole household loan, and had Defendant A file a marriage report with Defendant G by falsity, thereby satisfying the requirements for a loan application, and then introduced Defendant A to the H in order to implement specific loan procedures.
B. On October 19, 2010, Defendant G received a proposal from Defendant F that Defendant A would be entitled to obtain the above loan application form, and accepted the proposal that Defendant A would receive the payment for a marriage report, and reported the marriage with Defendant A.
C. On Nov. 1, 2010, H recruited Defendant A, who is difficult to borrow a financial institution by a normal method, by creating documents and false housing charter contract, etc., with which the Defendant A, who is difficult to borrow a financial institution, to obtain a loan and divide the lease fund.
H around that time, although Defendant A had not been employed as an employee in short-term construction, the fact that Defendant A was requested to create documents related to the employment in which Defendant A was employed as an employee of short-term construction corporation, and Defendant D made false documents related to the employment of Defendant A, such as a certificate of employment, and delivered them to H.
E. Around that time, Defendant E accepted a proposal from Defendant B and C that he would pay for a lessor of a false house lease contract. Defendant E and A drafted a false lease agreement with Defendant E and A, “The deposit amount of KRW 70 million, lessor E and lessee” at the J real estate office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.
F. Around November 2010, Defendant A applied for a loan of KRW 49 million to an employee in charge of the loan of Korea Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Bank”), and the fact that Defendant A did not intend to rent a house as stated in the above lease agreement and served as a short-term construction.