logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.08 2018나582
소유권이전가등기절차이행 청구의 소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

after the filing of an appeal.

Reasons

The reasons for this court's acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are as follows, except for addition of the judgment under Paragraph (2) to the conjunctive claims added by this court, and therefore, it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the first instance.

Since each solar power plant of this case was not selected as a facility to apply the annual standard price in 2010, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 in accordance with Article 5 of the Agreement.

Judgment

The Plaintiff was a person who transferred claims under Paragraph 5 of the Agreement to H.

(Plaintiff’s preparatory brief dated November 15, 2017). Meanwhile, the Plaintiff asserted that the assignment contract was destroyed between H and H, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the plaintiff's assertion.

Thus, the plaintiff's primary claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is dismissed as there is no additional conjunctive claim in this court. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow