logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.28 2016나11492
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations by the court of first instance, and each evidence submitted by the court of first instance is acknowledged as legitimate, even if the result of the entrustment of the examination of medical records to the president of the Association of Medical Doctors of the court of first instance was

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the plaintiff added a decision on the conjunctive claim added by this court, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, on February 10, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the insured of the disaster relief insurance contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, was subject to the accident, such as rescue head and hot body, and the Plaintiff died on February 23, 2014, with their head and hot body changed and the Plaintiff died, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff, who is the beneficiary of the accident compensation insurance amount of KRW 30,000,000 and delay damages.

Therefore, as seen earlier, there is insufficient evidence to support that the deceased B died due to the disaster stipulated in the above accident relief insurance contract, and there is no other evidence to support this. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is rejected without any need to further examine the scope of the insurance money for the death of a usual accident.

3. If so, all of the plaintiff's claims of this case are dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance which dismissed the main claims is just in conclusion. Thus, all of the plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claims added by this court are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow