logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.17 2015나21716
매매대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or addition. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance added " March 16, 2007" in front of the "mutual change to the defendant", and the fifth part "the defendant's ownership" was purchased by the defendant.

The third 18 to 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is added to the "Evidence No. 5, 9, 15 of the evidence No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and testimony No. 6 of the witness F of the court of first instance."

The following shall be added to "C" of the fourth 7th sentence of the first instance court, and the "CFF" of the 15th and the 16th sentence shall be added to "C," and all "CFFF" of the 15th and 16th sentence shall be added to "CFF."

The fifth sentence of the first instance court's decision "O. 29, 2010.10.29" shall be used as "O. 4, 2010.11.4," and all "O.C.C. Bank" of No. 6, 10, and 14 shall be used as "C.C.C. Federation".

No. 15 to 17 of the fifth decision of the first instance court (No. 5) states, “The No. 5 of the decision of the first instance is the Plaintiff’s “The No. 5 of the No. 17,” and “The No. 5 of the decision of the first instance court, the Plaintiff, at the time of the instant agreement, signed the agreement with C and F as a guarantor and signed it.”

The 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance read the "CF" as the "CFF" and the 6th of the 6th "CFF", and the plaintiff asserts that "the plaintiff had been transferred to C of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2005th of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2005th of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2005th of the 17th of

However, the answer to each order of the submission of financial transaction information by the new banks, Korean banks, and Nonghyup Bank in the first instance and the first instance trial cannot be recognized.

arrow