A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant began to show a symptoms dependent on propool, etc., who received propool administered by a hospital, and received a shot sense, etc., among the psychotropic drugs, when the Defendant was faced with a view to propool or propool.

Around September 5, 2011, the Defendant administered 71 times in total, a psychotropic drug, as indicated in the List of Crimes, from the time on July 30, 201, in order to be administered by propool or sub-stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Answers to request the disclosure of information and the details of prescription;

1. A investigation report (to be accompanied by data, such as the prices and side effects of graduate sights and propools), price, and side effects;

1. Application of investigation reports (calculated of a suspect's penalty surcharge) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In a case where the facts constituting a crime are identical to the facts constituting a crime acknowledged by the court without any difference in the facts constituting a crime under Article 61(1)4, Article 4(1), and Article 2 subparag. 4(d) of the former Narcotics Control Act (amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 201) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. (amended by Act No. 10786, respectively), even if the prosecutor seeks the new Act after the amendment of a corporation at the time of trial, there is no concern that there would be substantial disadvantages to the defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense unless there is a difference in the gravity of punishment for the crime, and thus, the former Act, which is a corporation, may be applied properly

Supreme Court Decision 2000Do3350 Delivered on April 12, 2002