logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.15 2014고단1910
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

19,798 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional collection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. in the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 7, 2013. On December 20, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced the imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. and became final and conclusive on January 29, 2014.

1. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

The defendant was aware of the fact that the psychotropic drug substance that causes a psychotropic substance reaction to the water surface guidance system administered at the time of a WIG test on the water surface.

Nevertheless, at around 15:38 on June 12, 2013, the Defendant, at a division located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, made a false statement as if there was a disguised obstacle to D, who is the president of the above hospital, and applied for an examination at the surface of the water and applied for an examination at the surface of the water. From the above point of time, the Defendant administered the psychotropic drug in a way that caused the above D to injection of the psychotropic drug in one’s own arms.

8. From 19. up to 19. A total of 11 times, such as the Schedule of Crimes, administered propool or unstrokeed psychotropic drugs.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as the above paragraph 1, made a false statement as if D were to pay the medical expenses when D had the inspection on the surface of the water because D had a disguised disorder.

However, as mentioned in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant did not want to administer a propool, etc., and did not pay for the expenses for flight, and did not have any money at the time, so there was no intention or ability to pay D medical expenses.

The Defendant, as above, shall be charged with medical expenses to the victim even after deceiving the victim and undergoes a background test on the water surface from the victim.

arrow