1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 30, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a medical tourism (C-3-3) visa on December 30, 2014, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on January 9, 2015.

B. On January 30, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be detrimental to the status of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On March 20, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but was dismissed on September 24, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff acted as a member of a human rights organization in his/her home country and opposed to the policy for non-discrimination and youth mobilization.

The plaintiff was threatened with murder on the ground that he did not act in the post-saton force, and was detained in the government-satis and was subject to sexual adviser.

The plaintiff made a false statement that he would bring more money to the latter forces, thereby getting out to the Republic of Korea.

In addition, around July 2014, the Plaintiff received from B, a disease containing inorganic raw materials, and had the risk of using the hazardous materials as raw materials for mass destruction by the latter force, and asked at the father’s dump sump., and the latter forces known that the Plaintiff was in custody of the said enlisted group around January 2015, were found as a private teaching institute operated by the Plaintiff’s wife and the Plaintiff’s whereabouts were threatened.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to his home country, it is feared that the plaintiff might be injured by the latter force for the foregoing reasons, and that the plaintiff's home country is a war with the internal army and its neighboring countries.