Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around November 25, 2008, the Defendant conspiredd with C to report a false marriage by reporting the marriage to C, a disguised marriage, which was introduced by a person whose name is not known, or to C, who was a disguised marriage, who was introduced by the person whose name is not known, with the intention to make a false marriage report.

Around January 5, 2009, the Defendant had a public official in charge of family register submit a false report of marriage with the Defendant as if the Defendant was married with C and had the said public official enter false facts in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, by allowing the Defendant to store and operate the same in the above family register information system. Around that time, the Defendant exercised this by allowing the public official to store and operate the same in the above family register information system.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, entered false facts in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the accused and the defense counsel of the investigation report (a copy of the summary order issued by C), the investigation report (a report attached to the family relation certificate by the married party C), the investigation report (a report attached to the marriage report)

1. The summary of the argument that is the criminal father and the defense counsel denies the crime by asserting that the defendant only reported the marriage with the intent to form a genuine marital relationship with C, but does not make a false report on the marriage due to the purpose of stay, etc.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① the Defendant reported marriage with C on January 5, 2009, and stated F and G in the witness column of the marriage report. C is the foregoing G on February 15, 2009.