A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 23, 2014, around 04:40 on October 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the E Hospital managed by the Victim D, the Defendant: (b) was released from the hospital and did not receive money and clothes; and (c) the Defendant, the custodian, attempted to open the entrance; (d) however, the Victim D, who was the custodian, was likely to cause the disturbance, attempted to open the door; (e) was at least 10 minutes of the door so that the door locked with the lock can not be opened; (e) destroyed the lock so that the market price can be set off; (e) opened the entrance to the hospital, and intruded the structure of the victim’s management.

2. On October 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent to the State Police Station G that was located in F on October 16:20, 2014; (b) sent to the said Police Station that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (c) sent to the said Police Station that “I reported that I would have reported that I would have reported that I would have come to a restaurant; and (d) returned to the Police Station; and (c) took a bridge, she took a bath to the said H; and (d) assaulted the said H by going to the said Police Station.”

The Defendant, when the police officer who belongs to the above police box (the age of 51) prevented the Defendant from committing the act of the Defendant, she saw the aboveJ to perform his bath, and she exceeded the clothes immediately due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, she sees how much the amount of the thesis the I cafeteria was taken, and she sees how much the amount of the thesis the I cafeteria was frighted, and her hand flabed with the aboveJ’s chest, and her flabd with the flab, thereby undermining the flab of the aboveJ.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of the above H and J crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Statement made to the police officer in relation to H and J;

1. Application of each video statute of the investigative report (a photographed with a photograph, such as destruction and damage of property);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and the Criminal Act concerning the crime.