Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2013, the defendant was appointed as the director of the building house division of the Daegu Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City Office, and has been in charge of construction authorization and permission, related supervision and supervision, civil petition processing, etc.

1. From May 2013, the Defendant of acceptance of bribe from D and E was planning for the above construction housing and the employees unity conference, and was a building company located in F in Busan Suwon-gu, Busan, and was invited by H(State) representative director D to run the new construction of Daegu G apartment from around 2012, and opened a single competition in Busan Mari-gu, Busan, with the invitation of the representative director D.

Accordingly, on May 16, 2013, the Defendant provided entertainment equivalent to KRW 1,286,00 in total, including KRW 1,286,00,00 at a singing room and singing room, to the effect that “The Defendant, at the J frequency branch in Suwon-gu, Busan, I and 5, he was 25 members of the building house and staff of the Gu office of C,” and that “the Defendant, at the site of the construction site of the above D and the above G apartment construction site, may easily handle civil petitions, etc. against the construction to be progress in the future” from E, who is the director of the construction site of the above D and the above G apartment construction site. The Defendant received entertainment equivalent to KRW 1,110,00,000 in the singing room cost, and received from D through K (the name of the pre-name L), which is the construction site of the construction site.

Accordingly, the Defendant received a bribe equivalent to the amount calculated by dividing the total amount of KRW 2,686,00 ( KRW 1280,000,000,000,000,000) in connection with his duties by 28 persons (including the Defendant, and KRW 26,000,000,000,000,000 in cash) who are the intervenors.

2. On December 14, 2014, the Defendant of acceptance of a bribe from D and M was granted KRW 100,000,00 to Q representative director and the head of the Daegu Headquarters of the said company, for the purport that “The convenience of construction works in the Gu of Daegu Metropolitan City and the construction works, permission, civil petitions, etc. that will be carried out in the Gu of Daegu Metropolitan City is changed” from H representative director D, and again received KRW 1,00,000,000 from Q representative director and the head of the said company’s Daegu headquarters as above.

Accordingly, the defendant's total amount of 2 million won is a bribe in relation to his duties.