logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.01.10 2016고단998
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by imprisonment for one year, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has served as a vice-chairperson of a P in which M is an adviser while working as a head of the Changwon of the M election campaign office in the N election implemented on June 4, 2014.

Defendant

B is a person who served as a general manager of the P.

Defendant

C is a person who served as the head of the M election campaign office at the time of the above N election, and after M was elected as N, the representative interest of Q (M) from October 2015 to the head of the R-based S Secretariat.

Defendant

D is a class of M M's high-class social relationship.

Based on the fact that there is a friendly relationship with M, the Defendants solicited public officials in charge of the school facilities construction that ordered R and its affiliated organizations (hereinafter referred to as “R, etc.”) to arrange for specific companies to supply government-funded materials and to receive the brokerage fees from the successful companies in receiving orders.

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s violation of the Defense Act regarding the arrangement of orders for government-funded materials by T companies, thereby introducing the representative of T companies, the branch, to Defendant A, and Defendant A introduced U to Defendant C.

Defendant

A, B, and C solicited public officials in charge of the construction of school facilities so that T may receive government-funded materials from R, etc. and promised to acquire 3% of each of the 14% by receiving 14% of the total amount from U as rebates.

Accordingly, from April 8, 2015 to October 14, 2015, Defendant A, B, and C received KRW 29,200,000,000 from U in total on seven occasions under the pretext of giving orders to the public officials in charge from April 10, 2015 to October 14, 2015.

As a result, Defendant A, B, and C received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting public officials to handle affairs in collusion.

2. Defendants’ 2.

arrow