beta
Text
Defendant
A, D, F, G, H, I, K, L, M, and P are punished by a fine not exceeding two million won, Defendant B, C, E, J, N, and P are punished by a fine not exceeding three million won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who is a defendant A shall be supplied with the status of supply under the Housing Act by fraud or other improper means;
around April 2014, the Defendant was offered as follows: “If he borrowed the name in the way of transferring the documents necessary for the application for parcelling-out, such as a certificate of disability, etc., he will apply for special supply of disabled persons using the above name, and pay honorariums if he resells it upon winning the right to buy a new apartment, in response to the proposal without the intention or ability to purchase it, the Defendant prepared documents necessary for the application for special parcelling-out to disabled persons in the name of the Defendant, and T put the same to T through S, which around April 2014, in the Daegu-gun U apartment model model in the Daegu-gun-gun U apartment model, the Defendant applied for special parcelling-out in the name of the Defendant, as if he applied for the parcelling-out as an actual user of the above apartment, and around April 30, 2014, the Defendant won the winning of the above apartment in the name of the Defendant around April 30, 2014.
Accordingly, in collusion with the above S and T, the Defendant received the apartment sale right, which is a status of special supply in accordance with the Housing Act, by unlawful means.
2. No person shall be supplied with the status of supply under the Housing Act by fraud or other improper means;
On February 2, 2015, the Defendant was offered as follows: “If the Defendant borrowed the name in the way of transferring the documents necessary for the application for parcelling-out, such as a certificate of disability, etc., he will apply for special supply of disabled persons using the above name, and pay honorariums if he resells it after winning the right to buy a new apartment, in response to the proposal, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to purchase a new apartment, and prepared documents necessary for the application for special parcelling-out of disabled persons in the name of the Defendant, and T put the same to T through S, which around February 2, 2015, and T was the model lower in V apartment model of the apartment at the time of racing around February 2015.