The defendant is innocent.

1. On August 6, 2008, the Defendant, despite that the victim C is not a member of the so-called D, posted a letter of “F, after accessing the Internet drone site using a computer,” which read “F,” on the bulletin board of the Defendant’s personal block “F,” the Defendant’s personal seal,” “F,” and reads in this country. He knows that he is the President of the Republic of Korea. He is pro-Japanese, and the letter of “H, supporting each country’s organization.” We are both nationals of the Republic of Korea. They are examined.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim C by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the person.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the record of the judgment are as follows: (i) the complainant was involved in the assembly and demonstration of 100 persons with DNA knowledge at around November 2007 under the “J” established by the professor, etc. on or around November 2004, under the jurisdiction of the President of the Republic of Korea (J); (ii) the above “J” was integrated with D Foundation around September 2008; and (iii) the said J-D Foundation’s organization with separate organization and human resources, and M&D Foundation’s organization with M&D Foundation’s main axis, but both are collectively owned with D’s name; and (iii) when considering the fact that it is called “D force” in the media, etc., which combines remuneration principles and freeism, it is difficult to view that the Defendant was a university professor as a false report.

Furthermore, even if the complainants are recognized to be false in the sense that they are not affiliated with the DNA Union, in light of the above circumstances, the “J-D Foundation” and the “DNE” are clear.