Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates the 'D cafeteria' of the 1st floor C of the building in Pakistan.

On December 19, 2018, at around 21:20 on December 19, 2018, the Defendant retired from the above restaurant in the first place in the state where the employees are able to pay the burden on the State gas room. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of a fire or the spread of a fire due to gas, such as a person engaged in the restaurant operation from being able to look at the gas room and not leaving the restaurant in a fluent state.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and left away without neglecting it, and as a result, the Defendant moved the fire from the heating stations to the nearby line at around 05:20 on the following day, and the explosion occurred due to the gas leakage that occurred when the gas measuring instrument was melted.

As a result, the victim G who is the owner of the above building E or F destroyed, the victim G, the owner of the victim I, the owner of the H, the victim K and the victim L, the victim N, the owner of the F, the victim's victim N, the owner of the above building, and the victim's name inf, the lessee of each building, who is the lessee of the above building, suffered damage equivalent to the total amount of KRW 121,394,056.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed a building in which people are present by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site inspection reports and damage evaluation reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (ex-site inspection and hearing statements made by victims), internal investigation (P CCTV verification), reporting of internal investigation (P CCTV verification), and reporting of internal investigation (Scenes verification of CCTV), and reporting of internal investigation (Scenes response to the results of identification of the fire investigation team by the

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 171, 170, and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Although considerable property damage has occurred due to the negligence of the defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant recognized the instant crime.