logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.05.13 2019가단240055
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, (1) the part of the building projected by the Defendant B, and (2) the Defendant C, in the attached Table 2.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: The grounds for claims shall be as shown in the annexed sheet;

2. Judgment made by confession, deemed confession or by public notice (Article 208 (3) 2 and 3, the main sentence of Article 150 (3) and the main sentence of paragraph (1) of the same Article of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Determination as to Defendant G’s assertion (the Defendant G argues that “I would not receive a deposit from the owner of the house, and would leave the Plaintiff to the extent of four million won,” but there is no evidence to determine the remainder of the lease guarantee amount which was not returned to the lessor, ② there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant G actually resided in the Plaintiff’s improvement zone for three months or more at the time of the resident inspection for the designation of the improvement zone, ③ the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the part of the Plaintiff’s 11, and the Plaintiff’s payment of the deposit for the “The transfer cost of movables 613 and 568 won,” calculated in accordance with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, etc. on April 20, 2020. In light of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s compensation for loss against Defendant G was lawfully completed, the above assertion against Defendant G is acceptable, or all of the above arguments are acceptable).

arrow