logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.15 2016고단1202
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Height 1202] The Defendant stolen food by entering a convenience store and eating it.

On November 5, 2015, the Defendant, at around 19:22, at the “E convenience store” operated by the victim D in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (a) stored 2 inside the convenience store the victim’s surveillance in the inner part of the convenience store with a total of KRW 10,000,000 at the market price; and (b) stolen it on November 5, 2015, from around 19:22 to February 20:30, 2016 at the same place, the Defendant stolen food of KRW 24,00 in total at the market price of KRW 10,000, as shown in attached Form (1) in the same manner.

[2016 Highest 2182] On April 17, 2016, at the “H” convenience store operated by the victim G located in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant stolen foods worth KRW 40,000,000, a total of nine times from August 2015 to the above date, as shown in the [Attachment 2] Re-Attachment 2, a victim-owned market price of KRW 6,800, which was displayed in the product display stand.

Summary of Evidence

Application of each CCTV image photograph Act to the defendant's legal statement D, G, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 329 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing under Article 50] shall be sentenced to punishment against the defendant in consideration of the fact that the defendant has been subject to punishment several times in the same manner, and that the defendant has repeated crimes of this case during the period of suspended execution of the same kind of crime.

However, the defendant reflects his mistake, the damage amount is minor due to food of convenience stores, and the victim.

arrow