Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the day this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are above one year each.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the friendship of the victim C (V, 16 years old), and the defendant B is the person who received the defendant's request from around July 2015 to receive the victim's reliance on the same religion as the defendant A.

1. On March 2016, the Defendants committed the joint crime of the Defendants: (a) at the home of the Defendant B located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon and E on March 2016, on the grounds that the victim had contacted the alternative school-friendly districts using the Defendant’s mobile phone roll with the Defendant Company A without the victim’s permission; (b) Defendant B was 10 times the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her/ her her her her/ her her her her her her/ her her her her her her her her/ her/ her her her her

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed physical abuse that may harm the body of a child victim or harm the physical health and development of a child.

2. Defendant B

A. On July 20, 2015, around 22:00, at the home of Defendant F and G located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around July 2015, the Defendant met the victim’s hand floor with the inside flag of wooden material (45cm in length) on the ground that the victim flageded with the friendship who supported the same sex while carrying out the same-sexing activity.

B. On July 2016, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, M. M. on July 1, 2016, said that the victim would wish to go to H, and that the victim would not want to go to H, and that he would not want to go to a swimming pool, and that he would not want to go to a swimming pool, the Defendant got off the victim’s body, such as parts, arms, and head.

(c)

On September 2016, the Defendant prohibited the Defendant from using smartphones at the home of the Defendant’s office described in the foregoing sub-paragraph (b) on the ground that the Defendant used the victim’s smartphones, but caused damage to the victim’s drums on the ground that the Defendant used the victim’s smartphones.