1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 21, 2015, the Plaintiff was an employee of B Co., Ltd., and was diagnosed as “absor and sorgressorings in the vicinity of receiving and receiving regions, and absorgings and sorressorings in the right-side sub-chapters,” and provided medical care until January 31, 2018 under the Defendant’s medical care approval, and filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on March 6, 2018.

The function disorder of the left-hand hand-hand hand-hand hand-free : The physical scope of the balance pipe 40 degrees, the scope of the movement range of 50 degrees to the right-hand hand-hand hand-hand hand-on-hand hand-on-hand hand-on-hand hand-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on-hand hand-on-on

B. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant decided the Plaintiff’s disability grade 14 with respect to the Plaintiff.

The detailed decision-making details are as follows:

C. On July 11, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a request for a review against the determination of the above disability grade, and the Defendant revoked the determination of the above disability grade 14 in accordance with the results of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee that “The Plaintiff’s final disability grade falls under Grade 11, which is adjusted to Grade 12 of both sides of both sides, based on the results of the review that “The Plaintiff’s final disability grade falls under Grade 14, the Plaintiff’s disability grade is revoked according to the determination of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee that “The Plaintiff’s technical disability under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is not observed, and as a result, it is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s exercise scope is the same as that of the exercise scope measured by the Busan Regional Integration Review Committee, but it is obvious that both sides of both sides are destroyed and routed. However, in view of the video data’s opinion, it is determined that the Plaintiff’s final disability grade is the same as that of the Plaintiff.”

The above disability grade decision changed by review below is the left-hand side of the disposition of this case.