logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.09.27 2019구단52549
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. During the construction work on August 25, 2002, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the field of the shoulder, the e-mail collision (proof), the e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail

B. After receiving the first additional medical care from September 14, 2005 to April 5, 2006, the Plaintiff was determined by applying mutatis mutandis the disability grade of Grade 9 [The Plaintiff was determined by applying mutatis mutandis the method of adjusting the 10th grade [the 10th grade [the 10th grade [the remaining person who has a significant obstacle to the function of one joints among the three joints of one joints of one arms, the right shoulder exercise range 225 degrees] and the 12th grade [the remaining person who has an obstacle to the function of one joints among the three joints of one arms, the remaining person who has an obstacle to the right joints of one joints of one joints of one arms, the 200 degrees of movement scope of one joints of one joints of one arms].]

C. The Plaintiff obtained additional medical care from May 8, 2017 to May 2, 2018, with the approval of additional injury and disease as “the right-hand side of the ex post facto injury and disease”.

On September 20, 2017, when the Plaintiff was under additional medical care, the Plaintiff was administered for the reduction of human functions to the right shoulder.

After the completion of the second additional medical care, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on May 18, 2018, and on July 27, 2018, the Defendant determined the disability grade of class 8-6 against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The detailed decision-making details are as follows:

8th grade 6 of the functional disability of the right shoulder (a person who has been unable to properly use one joints of the three joints of one arms (a person who has been extracted by inserting the artificial joints or the joints of human body)) the scope of the exercise of the functional disability of the joints of the right blue joints (260 degrees (=70 degrees before the 120 degrees revolving the new 0 degrees revolving the 120 degrees revolving the 70 degrees revolving the 70 degrees revolving the 120 degrees revolving the new 0 degrees revolving the 120 degrees revolving the external session). The final disability grade 8.

arrow