Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

around 19:20 to 21:50 on May 26, 2014, the Defendant 2012 obstructed the victim’s door-based business by forcibly obstructing the victim’s door-based business by forcibly obstructing the victim’s door-based business by putting the victim’s desire to “fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free fright-free.

On June 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00, the victim G in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (F) 103 dong 1004 dong 103 and 1004 dong 10; and (b) the Defendant, at the entrance of the above apartment 103 entrance, had a secret number and opened the entrance and opened the entrance before the door shuts down; (c) around 10 minutes of the elevator’s 104 door knife and 10 minutes of the elevator’s knife with the 104 door knife with the 10th knife with the 10th knife with the 10th knife with the knife with the knife’s knife with the knife with the knife’s knife with the drinking door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and G

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the choice of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of fines, etc. (the point of intrusion upon residence, and the choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Each of the crimes in this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is committed by the defendant during the period of repeated crime, but the nature of the crime is poor, but the defendant's mistake is recognized and against it, and the victim A.