Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2015, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s crime: (a) destroyed and damaged the lines and articles that the Defendant was working at the victim’s office located in the Daegu Suwon-gu C and the third floor, Daegu-gu, and the third floor; and (b) caused damage to the said lines and articles in relation to the change of the lines and articles, and (c) caused F and Si expenses to be carried out by the Defendant, who was an employee, the Defendant, “I go to the police, and you want to go to the end.”

Recognizing that it will not be allowed to leave the victim’s ship, the victim’s door-to-door business was obstructed by force for about one hour and 30 minutes, such as “n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't.

2. The Defendant committed the crime in Defendant B, on the same date, at the same place as that set forth in paragraph (1) and on the same grounds as that set forth in paragraph (1), fell short of the victim D’s fingers, and “this son is any more bad.”

“A police officer G, etc. dispatched upon receipt of a report, she saw that “at the time rings, rings, bitch bits, bitch bits, bitch bits, etc.” she obstructed the victim’s head-house business by force for about one hour by leaving the above head-house customers out of the place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of photographs of on-site CCTV data);

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On October 9, 2015, Defendant B’s summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 23:00, at the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu, and D’s head office and approximately 20 customers in the E’s head office within the third floor of D’s operation; and (b) the victim who was dispatched upon receipt of a report and dispatched under approximately 20 customers.