logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.17 2017노3097
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The person was working at the business in this case with the summary of the grounds for appeal;

H introduced the Defendant “F to the same f,” and introduced F to the Defendant, “F to the same f,” and the “F to the 1995 undergraduates,” and the “F to the Defendant,” the head of the kitchen G, who was entrusted with the operation of the instant establishment from the Defendant, also the Defendant “F’s resident registration certificate, was the F to the Defendant in 195.” As such, the Defendant believed that he was the f’s horse and f’s horse to the F, there was no intention to employ a juvenile.

2. In light of the legislative purpose of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles, etc., the business owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles, such as an entertainment shop, shall not employ juveniles at the relevant business establishment for the purpose of protecting juveniles. Therefore, the business owner of an entertainment shop shall verify the age of juveniles based on his resident registration certificate or evidence with public probative value of age to the extent that he employs employees at the relevant entertainment business establishment.

If it is not easy to confirm the age of a person eligible for employment due to the loss of his/her identification card, etc., if the person eligible for employment is not easy to confirm his/her status and age due to the loss of his/her identification card, the employer of a juvenile harmful business establishment shall withhold or refuse the use of his/her identification card until the juvenile is able to verify his/her age by public certification in light of the circumstances of employment vulnerable to the entertainment business (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2002Do2425, Jun. 28, 2002; 2006Do477, Mar. 23, 2006). According to the evidence duly adopted and duly examined by the court below, G of the instant business establishment was conducted at the instant business establishment around March 2016.

A restaurant, together with the F, a juvenile who became aware of through H, is added to the restaurant.

arrow