logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.07 2015고정4421
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the manager of the 'E' entertainment shop located in the fourth floor of the building D in Busan-gu, Busan-do.

On April 23, 2015, the Defendant, on the condition that the Defendant did not properly take age verification measures against F (V, 16 years of age) and G (V, 16 years of age) who were found to have reported entertainment reception reception advertising advertisements at the above entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment stores, and instead paid 30,000 won per hour, employed juveniles at entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment establishments.

2. Defendant B, as the owner of the above amusement shop, committed a violation under Paragraph A, who is a manager, as the owner of the above amusement shop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A copy of the I resident registration certificate;

1. Expressions and J advertisements;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel subject to the statutes governing a copy of business permit

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 58 Subparag. 4 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 29 Subparag. 1 of the Act, and the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 62, Article 58 Subparag. 4, and Article 29(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order

The argument is asserted.

In light of the legislative purpose of the Juvenile Protection Act, since the employer of a business harmful to juveniles, such as entertainment establishments, has a very strict responsibility for not employing juveniles for the purpose of protecting juveniles, the employer of a business harmful to juveniles such as entertainment establishments, and therefore, when the employer of an entertainment establishment employs employees of the relevant entertainment establishment, the subject's age should be confirmed based on resident registration certificate or other evidence with public probative value of age to the degree of age.

arrow