logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.21 2013고단5036
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving of Cysta taxi, Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of D dump trucks.

1. Defendant A driven the above taxi on July 12, 2013, around 04:30, and driven the intersection in front of the port station located in 7-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, at the speed of about 93-95 km from the right side of the Yellow Sea to the right side of the coast.

At the time, it is a new wall, and its location was an intersection where the vehicle signal, etc. is installed, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle without speed and speeding the front door in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the top part of the D D D D dump truck operated by B, who was on the right side from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant, due to the negligence of the Defendant who left the left-hand turn in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim E (the age of 51) who was on board the taxi head of the Defendant’s taxi due to the above occupational negligence, on the job due to brain injury.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 위 1.항과 같은 일시경 위 트럭을 운전하여 위 교차로를 삼한강 쪽에서 인천항 샛길 쪽으로 편도 2차로 중 2차로를 따라 시속 약 20-30km로 진행하게 되었다.

At the time, it is a new wall, and the place was an intersection where the vehicle signal, etc. is installed, so the defendant engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the front door in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the A's C Lasta taxi, which was trying to keep the left-hand side of the Defendant's running direction from the right-hand side of the Defendant's running direction by negligence, which caused the Defendant to go ahead of the red signal.

In the end, it is eventually.

arrow