logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.12.09 2015나51377
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "A" was added to "A" after the second 13th of the second 13th judgment of the court of first instance; "A" was added to "A"; "A" after the fourth 14th of the same 15th judgment "A"; "I" was used as "A's room for pro-Japanese G's house at the time of May 11, 2013" in the same 15th 17:30 on May 17:30, 2013; "A's room for pro-Japanese G's house located in the JJ of the Ma-gu, Jin-gun-gun, the court of first 18th 18th , and "A's house at the time of prosecution" was found to be "A's house at the time of the first 19 and 20th 14th 14th 20 , and the plaintiffs committed an additional unlawful act."

In addition, the plaintiffs are 'the plaintiffs', the fourth 19 to the fifth 2 pages.

3. Except where the part of the judgment on the Defendants’ assertion is deleted, and the five-way “4. conclusion” in the five-way “3. conclusion,” the part on the grounds of the judgment in the first instance is the same as the part on the grounds of the judgment, and such part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is in conclusion, and it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow