1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. Text of the judgment of the court of first instance;

1. The reasons for this Court’s explanation are as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance [1. Facts premised on the premise of 1.) from [2. Judgment on Claim] to [2.]. Thus, the above part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the argument and its judgment concerning unauthorized representation added in the

In addition, the “the deceased” in the second 8th 8th th th th 8th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

According to the statement of the evidence No. 22 and the testimony of the O of the party witness, Defendant B’s performance of the above obligation to M on April 26, 2018, which was after the decision of the qualified acceptance was made.

However, the above repayment against M is an important issue. In light of the defendants' assertion that the above repayment against M is reversed, the defendants' assertion related to the cancellation of the above cancellation is the part that must be proved with the objective evidence of credibility.

However, according to the above evidence, the above obligation against M was the first obligation that the deceased asked to repay in the will book, and therefore the Defendants did not have much time after the decision of qualified acceptance was made.