logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1961. 4. 28. 선고 4294형상85 판결
[사문서위조,사문서위조행사][집9형,049]
Main Issues

Transmission of the record of appeal after the statutory period has expired and the grounds of appeal

Summary of Judgment

Since the period of forwarding the records of proceedings in this Article is a decoration provision, the violation of the same Article cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 377 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 234 of the Criminal Act

Appellant, Defendant

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court, Seoul High Court, Seoul High Court, etc.

Reasons

According to Article 377 of the Criminal Procedure Act, insofar as the filing of an appeal is not contrary to the legal form in the filing of an appeal, or is not subsequent to the extinguishment of the right to appeal, the court below shall decide to send the records of trial to the public prosecutor of the public prosecutor's office corresponding to the court within 14 days from the date of receiving the petition of appeal, and thereby, the court below shall not be able to be able to prove that the court below had sent the records of trial to the public prosecutor's office after the lapse of about two months, such as the theory of lawsuit, and therefore, it shall not be able to prove that the records of trial were sent to the public prosecutor's office after the expiration of about two months.

Justices Oh-Wil (Presiding Judge) Kim Young-chul and Kim Hong-sub

arrow