A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On December 19, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of road traffic law at the Seoul Central District Court on December 10, 2006, a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime at the same court on December 10, 2008, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for fines for the same crime on December 31, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime on October 8, 2010 for the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around September 20:35, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-hand car owned by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.071% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol content 0.071% in the middle of the city of Gwangju at approximately 30km from an insular street (hereinafter referred to as the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government) to the early street of 304 square meters in front of the city of Gwangju.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car with B low-typ.

On September 6, 2017, at around 20:35, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, and made the turn to the left at an insurous speed in the direction of both sides at the right angle of the city of Gwangju, the intersection of the private street near the 304-ro of the city of Gwangju at the right angle.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent an accident by reducing speed to a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle, keeping the front door well, and safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left and went to the left in violation of the signal, and was placed on the opposite lane in accordance with the Madar No.

The front part of the DNA Round, which C(33) drive, was the front part of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.