logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단473
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 1.5 million won by a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on July 2, 2009, and a summary order of 2 million won by the same court on July 13, 2016, respectively.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a car with B low-priced other car in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.124% among blood transfusions on December 19:2, 2016, while driving the said car, and driving the intersection in front of the “D cafeteria” located in the Geum-gu, Busan, as “hot spring tank” located in the “D cafeteria.”

In this case, there was a duty of care to reduce speed immediately before entering the intersection and to safely proceed with the front side and the right and the right by the driver of the motor vehicle in the case of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of being negligent in driving while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) led the victim E (38) who was driven by the driver’s signals of the vehicle signal from the right-hand side of the moving direction to the left-hand side of the vehicle; and (b) led the victim E (38) to the front-hand part of the vehicle’s left-hand side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant caused the above franchise by occupational negligence and damaged the front door of a passenger car, it did not immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person, and escaped as it is.

2. On the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the above low-speed car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.124% in front of the “Woo-gu Apartment apartment” located in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si, Seo-gu, Busan-gu. In order to ensure that the Defendant driven the above low-speed car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.124%.

Accordingly, the defendant violates Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

arrow