logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.04.22 2019가단106917
소유권이전등기청구의 소
Text

1. Of the area of 430.7 square meters in Dong-gu Daejeon-gu E, Daejeon, one point is the Plaintiff A indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. With respect to the land of this case, the attached Form 2, including the plaintiffs and the defendants, shall be attached to the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu E 430.7 square meters (hereinafter "the land of this case").

A co-ownership registration is made in the future of the holders mentioned in the subsection.

The share of the instant land was transferred to the current nominal owner due to sale, donation, auction, inheritance, etc.

B. The Plaintiff A occupies the portion of 40.6 square meters in the ship connecting each point of the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 1 among the instant land (hereinafter “B”), and the portion of 18.9 square meters in the C/C (hereinafter “c/C portion”) connecting each point of the separate sheet Nos. 7, 8, 12, 13, and 7 in sequence, among the instant land; and the Plaintiff C occupies the portion of 19.4 square meters in the d/C portion connected each point of the separate sheet No. 9,3,10, 11, and 9 (hereinafter “d/C portion”).

C. Of the registered titleholders, H died on January 6, 2016. The inheritor’s share in Defendant I’s inheritance by Defendant I, J, K, and L is 3/9, Defendant J, K, K, and L respectively 2/9.

[Ground] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' primary claims

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) At the time of the Daejeon East-dong and Ndong War, the refugees who were South Korea were living in the land owned by the State at the time of the Korean War, and the market was formed (tentative O market). The State specified the location and size of each land to the merchants and residents who were funeraled in the land owned by the State, and completed the registration of ownership transfer with the co-ownership share on the entire land for convenience, instead of prohibiting the registration of ownership transfer by dividing the land into each owner to the non-owned land, including the land in this case. The persons who completed the registration of ownership completed the registration as above have completed the registration of ownership again to the buyers. 2) The plaintiff is divided into two parts among the land in this case, the plaintiff B, the C, and the plaintiff C, the D D, respectively, and the co-ownership share on the entire land for convenience.

arrow