beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against D who is represented by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Determination on the defense prior to the merits
A. The Defendant asserts that the instant lawsuit is unlawful upon the filing by a non-representative of the power of representation. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the written evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 8, 2, and 3 (including various numbers), the Plaintiff was established and placed in the status of representative by C around 1998, composed of ten or more members, and six members, including D and E, transferred a church to the Defendant around 201. The Plaintiff was integrated into the Defendant one year thereafter, and D moved the representative of the Plaintiff from C to D on the basis of the general meeting minutes, etc. written at will on February 6, 2015. D brought the instant lawsuit on behalf of the Plaintiff. According to the Plaintiff’s articles of incorporation, the Plaintiff’s special meeting minutes, including the Plaintiff’s special meeting minutes, which had been pending in the first instance trial, should be held by the chairperson, and the Plaintiff’s special meeting minutes, including the Plaintiff’s special meeting minutes, should be held by the 10th of Nov. 26, 2017.
B. According to the above facts of recognition, changing the Plaintiff’s representative from C to D on February 6, 2015 does not have the effect of changing the Plaintiff’s representative as the Plaintiff’s representative because it did not go through lawful procedures, and the instant special meeting cannot be deemed to have been duly convened as long as D was not the chairperson of the operation with the authority to convene the Plaintiff’s extraordinary meeting. Thus, even if D was elected as the Plaintiff’s representative in the instant special meeting, the validity of the election of
Therefore, the instant lawsuit was brought by a person who is not authorized to represent the Plaintiff, and is unlawful without further review.
2. As such, the instant lawsuit is unlawful as it is concluded.