1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 12,512,835 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount from April 20, 2018 to November 3, 2018.

... 1, 2) 인정. 나) 피고는 원고의 최초 주상병명에 비추어 과잉진료를 받았다고 주장하나, 갑 제3, 7, 8호증(각 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고가 피고의 이 사건 폭행으로 좌측 엄지손가락의 원위지골 골절, 얼굴의 표재성 손상, 타박상, 박피상, 뇌진탕, 머리뽐힘, 급성 스트레스 증후군 등의 상해를 입어 그 치료를 위해 가)항에서 인정한 치료비 및 약제비를 지출한 사실이 인정된다. 피고의 위 주장은 받아들이지 않는다. 3) 향후 치료비 원고는 향후 치료비로 성형외과 치료를 위해 215만 원이 필요하다고 주장하나, 갑 제7호증의 11의 기재만으로는 위 향후 치료비의 지출 필요성을 인정하기 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

4) Limitation A) Defendant’s ratio of liability: 7,512,835 won [20 million won for daily income 5,028,772 won and medicine expenses 7,492,620 won] 5] The circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the instant case and the degree of responsibility of both parties, the part and degree of injury suffered by the Plaintiff accordingly, the assault in this case appears to have suffered considerable mental damage due to the occurrence of the Defendant’s marriage before the Defendant’s marriage, and other circumstances shown in the arguments, shall be determined as KRW 5 million, taking into account all the circumstances shown in the arguments.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at each rate of 12,512,835 won (property damages KRW 75,512,835 million) and 15% per annum under the Civil Act until November 3, 2018, which is the date of the pronouncement of the judgment, where it is deemed reasonable to dispute as to the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform, as requested by the Plaintiff, from April 20, 2018 following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the date of full payment (property damages KRW 7,512,835 million).

3. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. Prior to the occurrence of damages liability, prior to the occurrence of the damages liability.