logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.21 2016구합63668
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

The details and details of the decision on reexamination were established on September 22, 1947, and the Plaintiff is a corporation that employs approximately 3,400 full-time workers and operates education and medical services.

As the Plaintiff’s affiliated organization, the C University and C University Medical Center (hereinafter “instant Medical Center”) are located, and there are hospitals affiliated with C University medical colleges and D Hospital affiliated with C University Medical Center (hereinafter “instant hospital”) under the Medical Center.

The Intervenor joining the instant hospital on August 1, 199 and served as the head of the original team from November 1, 2005 to February 28, 2014, and as the head of the asset management team from September 1, 2014 to the next dismissal.

On August 26, 2015, the Plaintiff dismissed the Intervenor from his position (hereinafter “instant dismissal”) and dismissed the Intervenor on October 16, 2015 (hereinafter “instant dismissal”).

(1) As the head of the original affairs team, the person to be disciplined requested the appointment of E around 2010 to the general affairs team, which is the personnel management department, and the F as the cooking contract staff in around 201, and the appointment of E to the cooking contract staff in December 1, 2010 to July 31, 201, and the F from August 1, 201 to July 31, 201, respectively.

A person to be disciplined was aware of the fact that E and F were not actually full-time after the conclusion of the labor contract, but did not report the actual condition to the head of the instant hospital, the head of the office, or the general affairs team at the time.

(2) A person subject to disciplinary action, as the head of the original affairs team, was aware of the non-standing problems of the contract cook F belonging to the original team, but did not report the fact, and made a false report on the fact that there is no problem in the actual working conditions of the employee, by the department, at the time of the probation inspection by each department that was conducted by the general affairs team from January 11, 2012 to February 27, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant ground for dismissal”). (1) Grounds for dismissal, and (2) The act of misconduct does not exceed “the Regulations on the Personnel Management of C University Medical Personnel.”

arrow