A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving mixed CBR 900C Obane with no number.

On June 1, 2014, at around 01:57, the Defendant driven the above Otoba, and proceeded five lanes in front of the subway stations located in 1082, as Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, along the three-lane distance from the border line to the road.

At the time of night, it was difficult to view the front door of the night, and there was a crosswalk on which signal lights are installed at the front door of that place. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and checking whether there is a vehicle parked while driving the vehicle well.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant neglected it and proceeded as it is, the Defendant was able to receive the front wheels of the Defendant, following the C Tworkra car driven by the victim B (hereinafter referred to as 46 years old) who was stopping at the front of the same lane in the same lane.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the victims D (n, 16 years old), who were on board the said car, to suffer injuries, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of treatment for about two weeks. At the same time, the Defendant immediately stopped the said car to the extent of KRW 1,066,578, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims, even if the repair cost, such as the exchange of pans, was destroyed by the said car.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;