logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.11 2014고정1854
상해
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 13:03 on June 14, 2014, around 13:03, the third floor J restaurant of the Daejeon Sung-gu I building was placed a passage between the clients in the restaurant.

In such cases, on the ground that heavy coffees can be accumulated into one another in walking the passage, etc., due to the fact that they go against one another, we should pay considerable attention. Defendant B is called “the facts charged in the middle where he was walking in the middle,” and the same revision is made.

The dump 2 degree image (such as clothes, left bucks, bucks, etc.) of the victim K (the 4 years old), which was in meals immediately adjacent to the fump where female son was faced, suffered approximately 2 weeks of treatment by the dump.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Images of CDs;

1. Diagnosis certificate - Application of A’s applicable Acts and subordinate statutes to A’s daughters;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph B of the option of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime: Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant B who bears the cost of lawsuit: Determination as to Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant alleged that he suffered from the scarcity so that he could not freely use the shoulder by suffering from the scarcity, and that he had no choice but to dembling the coffee due to the fact that he had no choice but to dembling it with female children while the restaurant floor was scarded.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence in the judgment, the following facts are recognized:

Defendant

B sets the coffee at a rapid speed with the date and time of the facts constituting the crime, and at the same time, sets the coffee to the victim K who was sitting at a place less than 1.5 meters away from the left side of the female son, and then sets it down rapidly to the degree of 3rd.

arrow